PURPOSE
The purpose of this experiment was to determine the effect of spring resistance on the speed of a remote control car on various racecourses.
I became interested in this idea because for the past two years I have had a strong interest in cars and wondered what resistance of springs made the car go fastest through turns.
The information gained from this experiment could help racers, and people who use 4 wheel drive recreational vehicles to know what springs to buy to go fastest.
My hypothesis was that the springs with the most resistance would create the fastest times on all three courses.
I based my hypothesis on a statement by Michael Seal, the leader of the Technological Institute at Western Washington University, who said that softer springs create loss of cornering power.
The constants in this study were:
- The weight of the car
- The turning distance of controller
- The battery power
- The course size
- Road Surface
The manipulated variable was the resistance of the springs in the back and front of the car.
The responding variable was the speed of the car through the three courses.
To measure the responding variable I used a stopwatch.
QUANTITY
|
ITEM DESCRIPTION
|
1
|
XMOD
Customizable RC Car
|
4
|
XMOD Springs
of different resistance
|
1
|
Metronome
that can be set to 40 and 80 bpm
|
1
|
Stopwatch
|
1
|
Pencil and
note book
|
36
|
“AAA” Batteries
|
PROCEDURES
1. Set up car for circle testing
a.) install first set of springs
(least resistance)
b.) Install new batteries
c.) Set car at about one third up the centerline
2. Complete
circle testing
a.) Turn steering wheel as far
counter-clockwise as possible
b.) Go to full throttle and start the timer
c.) After 3 laps stop the timer
3.
Repeat steps 2a-2c going clockwise
4. Adjust controller to maintain consistent slow speed
5. Repeat step 2 at slow speed
6. Repeat steps two through five with all resistances of springs
7. Find speed of car
d.) Run car at full throttle
e.) Go for thirty feet
f.) Divide the speed by thirty
7.
Adjust controller to maintain consistent slow speed
8. Complete Speed tests
RESULTS
The original purpose of this experiment was to determine the effect of spring resistance on the speed of a remote control car on various racecourses.
The results of the experiment were that the stiffest springs had the fastest time in two of the three categories at full throttle. In the straight speed the stiffest springs lead by about .23 seconds. In the circle to the right the softest springs had a slight edge of .05 seconds over the stiff springs. The circle to right was done fastest by the stiff springs with a time of 13.56, 1 second faster than the soft springs. But overall the softest springs ended up having the fastest time in all three courses.
CONCLUSION
My hypothesis was that the springs with the most resistance would create the fastest times on both courses.
The results indicate that this hypothesis should be rejected.
Because of the results of this experiment, I wonder if different
tire shapes or materials would affect the turning ability or speed. I
also wonder if different chassis weights would affect the turning ability.
If I were to conduct this project again I would have found a
better designed car to be as consistent as I could. I also would have done the
experiment in the summer so that I could do it outside. In the winter the cold
slows down the mechanics in the chassis. I think a slalom test would be
far better than any of the tests I was able to conduct with the car available.
Researched
by - Dan
0 comments:
Post a Comment